Roopa Reddy

Team

Commented on Metrics and Indicators subset - 2026 Claim Q1/Q2@cedars team please verify that the kW and therm values are converted to MW and MMtherms only once and are not inadvertently divided twice. Thank you.Commented on Metrics and Indicators subset - 2026 Claim Q1/Q2@cedars team Hi Sonja, The MMTherms and MW net savings values for C&S in the Metrics and Indicators Report appear to be inaccurate for both 2025 and 2026. I’ve attached the corrected values below for reference. The GWh net savings values, however, appear to be accurate. The value…Commented on Add missing fields to the Active dash output download to match Confirmed dash download@cedars team I validated the updates to the PA dashboards in cedars-2: Confirmed that download file names were successfully renamed in the Local and Statewide Active and Confirmed PA dashboards. All record-level downloads now consistently use the title "Measure Input and Cost Eff…Upvoted CET User Guide - Improvements to Fuel Sub guidance Created Update CEDARS Data Validation Rules to Support New DEER Delivery Types (PY2026+)Commented on CMPA for SEM: Must change the workflow for when the system issues Application_IDs for SEM Projects@cedars team @Amy.reardon@cpuc.ca.gov Hi Sonja, For item #1, I don’t have access to Otter, so I’m unable to confirm this at the moment. I will follow up with Sung, our SEM SME, to verify and provide an update. For item #2, PG&E did not encounter any issues with the CMPA applicati…Commented on Savings Date missing for many 2026 deemed claims@cedars team I completed UAT for the Savings Date enhancement in cedars-2. The good news is that the Savings Date is being populated correctly for all deemed claims, and the logic appears to be working as expected for PG&E’s Q2 claims. However, I noticed one issue. The Savings Da…Upvoted Population NMEC Cohort - Align initial and true-up claim Upvoted Improve eTRM Sync Resilience for Invalid Measure Package Data Commented on Participant table - add ability to remove ParticipantCount records@cedars team, Derya, the enhancement appears to be working as expected. My uploads (#768 and #769) are available in CEDARS-3, and the attached download retained the most recently uploaded data from #769. #768 upload: #769 (latest) upload:Commented on Participant table - add ability to remove ParticipantCount records@cedars team Thanks, Derya. I will be able to test later this afternoon.Commented on Load shape performance@cedars team PG&E has uploaded approximately 15 load shape files over the past two days, with about 67% of the files ranging between 80 MB and 180 MB in size. While some files completed processing within 24 hours, others were processed within 48 hours. As of now, nearly all files…Upvoted PA Measure Developer registration flow Upvoted Support Baseline Tech Group and Tech Type in Load Shape Uploads Upvoted Regression testing SavingsDate Upvoted Bring all PII QC rules forward into the specification page Upvoted Display UEC proportion values when selecting draft measure package Upvoted Allow editing of Primary Sector Upvoted Re-order Claim Spec fields to match CET ordering Upvoted Add missing fields to the Active dash output download to match Confirmed dash download Upvoted Do not allow program segment to be changed Upvoted Savings Date missing for many 2026 deemed claims Upvoted Sort Order Changes Upvoted Claims – Validate Claim.ClaimType Against Allowed Value List Commented on Savings Date missing for many 2026 deemed claims@cedars team Table 4 of D. 21-05-031, starting on p. 61, appears to provide the most comprehensive list of applicable regulatory requirements. DEER updates are implemented biennially during even-numbered years. The next DEER update is expected in mid-2028. The image below shows a…Commented on Savings Date missing for many 2026 deemed claims@cedars team Revised logic to accommodate the new DEER delivery types looks good to me. As discussed, the condition m.MeasImpactType like 'Deem%' can be replaced with upper(claim.claimtype) = 'DEEMED'.Commented on Add Fuel Sub Infrastructure Cost Fields to Claim Specification@cedars team Hi Derya, Since the Application Code field is not included in the current CPUC specification on the website (Fuel Sub Infrastructure Costs Data Collection Template), and the information can already be cross-referenced using the Claim ID, we believe it is appropriate…Commented on Participant Count Validation Error@cedars team Hi Erika, I retested the batch ⁠Upload 833 that previously generated the "Ensure this value is less than or equal to 32767" error. This time, the upload completed without encountering that validation error. It appears the issue has been resolved. Thank you for the fi…Commented on Census Tract Field Requirement Discrepancy@cedars team Hi Erika, The documentation looks accurate now. Thank you.Commented on Add Fuel Sub Infrastructure Cost Fields to Claim Specification@cedars team @Jake Richardson (PG&E) I noticed that, as part of the Fuel Sub Infrastructure Cost data, we have been including the Application Code in our submissions to date. I’m not sure whether this requirement was added later, as it was not part of the original specification.…