On behalf of BayREN, I’d like clarity on how populating the Measure table FuelID field affects CET outputs for fuel sub measures. In claims reporting, my team is considering using this field to identify all fuel sub claims because some fuel sub measure packages don’t use the fuel sub measure impact type values by default.
With the Q1-Q2 claims we’ve filed, including/removing the fuel sub FuelID for only one fuel sub claim (using measure SWHC044-07) affected CET outputs (TRC, PAC, RIM, SCT, ElecBens). We don’t understand why this is the case and whether we should expect similar results for other fuel sub claims.
For reference, I’ve attached our analysis comparing FuelID vs. no FuelID, along with a copy of the claims file with FuelID populated for BAYREN02 (the program in the Q2 submission containing fuel sub claims).
BAYREN02 FuelID Comparison.xlsx
229.9 KB• Spreadsheet
BAYREN02 Claims With FuelID.xlsx
52.6 KB• Spreadsheet
Please authenticate to join the conversation.
In Review
Feedback
Claim Spec
About 4 hours ago

Kevin Truong (TEC)
Get notified by email when there are changes.
In Review
Feedback
Claim Spec
About 4 hours ago

Kevin Truong (TEC)
Get notified by email when there are changes.