Understand how FuelID affects CET outputs

On behalf of BayREN, I’d like clarity on how populating the Measure table FuelID field affects CET outputs for fuel sub measures. In claims reporting, my team is considering using this field to identify all fuel sub claims because some fuel sub measure packages don’t use the fuel sub measure impact type values by default.

With the Q1-Q2 claims we’ve filed, including/removing the fuel sub FuelID for only one fuel sub claim (using measure SWHC044-07) affected CET outputs (TRC, PAC, RIM, SCT, ElecBens). We don’t understand why this is the case and whether we should expect similar results for other fuel sub claims. 

For reference, I’ve attached our analysis comparing FuelID vs. no FuelID, along with a copy of the claims file with FuelID populated for BAYREN02 (the program in the Q2 submission containing fuel sub claims).

BAYREN02 FuelID Comparison.xlsx

229.9 KB Spreadsheet

BAYREN02 Claims With FuelID.xlsx

52.6 KB Spreadsheet

Select the module in CEDARS
Cost Effectiveness Tool (CET), Claims

Please authenticate to join the conversation.

Upvoters
Status

In Review

Board
📨

Feedback

Tags

Claim Spec

Date

About 4 hours ago

Author

Kevin Truong (TEC)

Subscribe to post

Get notified by email when there are changes.