Derya Gumustel

Team

Created Allow users to upload load shapes to measure packages with some passing permutations Commented on New review team file downloadHi @sepidehs, I just wanted to share a progress update on this ticket. We’re currently working on a design for a dedicated measure package page that we hope will be useful to reviewers and measure developers alike. We should be ready to gather feedback on the design later this we…Commented on New review team file downloadHi @sepidehs, I’ve begun working on this ticket and would like to get a better understanding about how this data might best be organized for you and your team. Currently, users can download impact profiles at an individual scale from the Impact Profile Library. Given the volume o…Commented on Remove impact profiles for SWCA001-06, upload ID # 457This request has been completed on production this afternoon.Commented on PII QC Feedback - Flagging Population-Level NMEC ClaimsHi @KlarsonMCE, we’ve updated our PII QC logic to stop flagging population-level NMEC claims, so these shouldn’t trigger any feedback on the next round of submissions. I’m closing this ticket as completed. Thank you!Commented on Active claim submission period is not 2026Q2Hi @PCE_TEC, your active claim dashboard has now been set to 2026Q2.Commented on Participant table - add ability to remove ParticipantCount recordsHi @Roopa Reddy , I’ve deployed this change to cedars-3 while we wait to refresh cedars-2. If you have a chance to test the ability to replace participant records on cedars-3 and let us know if it’s working as expected, we can include it with Monday’s claim spec release. Let me k…Commented on Add Fuel Sub Infrastructure Cost Fields to Claim SpecificationHi @Roopa Reddy, as far as I can tell not all PAs have been including the Application Code field in their Fuel Sub Infrastructure Cost data submissions. Let us know if you need any more detail or have any follow-up questions.Upvoted Improve visibility of Impact Profile generation outcomes for Load Shape uploads Commented on Load Shapes – Version control between eTRM & CedarsWork for this has been deployed, outdated draft measure package versions will no longer appear in the measure package selection drop down on the load shapes upload page.Commented on CET is stuckGreat, in that case I’m going to close this ticket as complete. Thank you and let us know if you have any other trouble with CET runs!Commented on CET is stuckHi @Kevin Truong (TEC)@BayREN_TEC, thanks for your patience on this one. It looks like cedars-2 fell behind of recent updates to production and the default CET run settings were out of sync with what the CET was expecting, causing runs on cedars-2 to get stuck without ever comple…Commented on CET is stuckHi @Kevin Truong (TEC), is there a reason you’re doing this run on staging/cedars-2 instead of production? It looks like the queue for cedars-2 got a little backed up, I’m trying to get files to process now but I’m not sure how long it’ll take.Upvoted Load Shape - Downloadable validation report Upvoted Remove NormUnit from load shape 8760 upload specification Upvoted Add PA-specific queues to PAs don't get in each others way in the load shape library Upvoted Add email notification when load shape derived impact profile generation completes Upvoted Allow measure developers to upload more than one load shape 8760 file at a time Upvoted Load Shapes – Version control between eTRM & Cedars Commented on Load Shapes – Investigate Server Error on Cedars-2 After Successful eTRM ValidationThe load shape file upload process has been updated to accept building location values in the format “CZ##”, which resolves the error seen in this ticket.Upvoted CET Simplification Commented on Downloadable CET for 2025 claims does not represent the final claimsThanks @GGolden42, I’ve fixed this on production and am closing this ticket as complete. Let us know if anything else comes up!Commented on Downloadable CET for 2025 claims does not represent the final claimsHi @GGolden42 thank you for the clarification. It looks like the record-level download files didn’t get refreshed when you recently confirmed the 2025YR claims. I’ve regenerated them on cedars-3 as a test fix, could you check that the download there matches the values you’re expe…Created Provide users feedback when Claim table dates are incorrectly formatted Commented on SCG – CET& Claim issue in CEDARS productionHi @SSprague, we can confirm that the CET was run on the SCG 2025YR claims on 4/25 and files were successfully sent to the CET, but the CET is not including all expected records in its calculations. It looks like a new file was uploaded to the SCG 2025YR claims on 4/25, so if you…Commented on Claims SCG Q4 confirmed dashboard TSB wrongGreat, thank you for taking a look! I’m going to close this ticket as completed.Commented on Claims SCG Q4 confirmed dashboard TSB wrong@sacharya @ecorona2 Hello, thank you for resubmitting this claim last week. We saw that the CET successfully ran that one remaining claim and we’ve now rerun the CEDARS-side processes that required that step. The confirmed claims dashboard for SCG is now showing a total TSB of ~$…Commented on Claims SCG Q4 confirmed dashboard TSB wrongSorry, I just noticed that the last local claim upload for SCG on production appears to be the corrected claim for that claim ID. If that’s the case, can you confirm if the total on production, $199.8M, is what you were expecting to see for TSB? Thank you!Commented on Claims SCG Q4 confirmed dashboard TSB wrongHi @sacharya, I just wanted to follow up and let you know that we were able to rerun the CET on most of the Q4 claim IDs that were missing from the confirmed claims dashboard. The SCG Q4 TSB is now $199.8M on production, please double check that this is closer to what SCG is expe…Commented on Claims SCG Q4 confirmed dashboard TSB wrongHi @sacharya we may have located the issue. The SCG 2025 Q4 confirmed claims dashboard is now showing $199M on cedars-3, could you let us know whether this is the value your team is expecting to see? https://cedars-3.cpuc.ca.gov/claims/confirmed-dashboard/ We’re still in the prog…