New validation for Dual Baseline measures

Problem that this solves:
In the Energy Division’s review of quarterly claims, they often see dual baseline measures where the second baseline costs are missing.

What we’d like it to do:

  • Enforce that an AR claim must have a nonzero incremental cost if there are nonzero savings in the 2nd baseline.

  • If a dual baseline measure has a saving populated, then 2nd baseline costs must be populated.

Fields:
Measure.UnitkW2ndBaseline
Measure.UnitkWh2ndBaseline
Measure.UnitTherm2ndBaseline
Measure.UnitkWhIOUWater2ndBaseline
Measure.UnitMeaCost2ndBaseline

Validation:
If 2nd second baseline energy savings are populated, then 2nd baseline costs must be > 0

Select the module in CEDARS
Claims

Please authenticate to join the conversation.

Upvoters
Status

In Testing Queue

Board
💡

Feature Request

Tags

2026

ETA
Jun 09, 2026
Date

7 months ago

Author

cedars team

Subscribe to post

Get notified by email when there are changes.