Skip to main content

Data tab and Claims dashboard - Claims Record-level download to include 2026 input and outputs

Feature Request2026 Claim Spec Update Queue2026Data TabDesign Upgrade

Add any new input fields from the 2026 claims spec update and the new set of CET v25.1 cost effectiveness outputs to the data tab record-level download for Claims so that the data is accessible for CPUC analysis.


Fields to include are:

Fuel ID

Unit Tax Credits

Water Energy Benefits

Water Energy Benefits Gross

Water Energy Cost

Water Energy Cost Gross

Electric Bill Reduction

Electric Bill Increase

Gas Bill Reduction

Gas Bill Increase

Electric Benefits Gross SCB

Electric Benefits Gross SCH

Electric Benefits SCB

Electric Benefits SCH

Electric Supply Cost Gross SCB

Electric Supply Cost Gross SCH

Electric Supply Cost SCB

Electric Supply Cost SCH

Gas Benefits Gross SCB

Gas Benefits Gross SCH

Gas Benefits SCB

Gas Benefits SCH

Gas Supply Cost Gross SCB

Gas Supply Cost Gross SCH

Gas Supply Cost SCB

Gas Supply Cost SCH

RIM Cost No Admin

SCB Cost

SCB Cost Gross

SCB Ratio No Admin

SCH Cost

SCH Cost Gross

SCH Cost No Admin

SCH Ratio No Admin

Tax Credits

Tax Credits Gross

Water Energy Benefits Gross SCB

Water Energy Benefits Gross SCH

Water Energy Benefits SCB

Water Energy Benefits SCH

Water Energy Cost Gross SCB

Water Energy Cost Gross SCH

Water Energy Cost SCB

Water Energy Cost SCH



Select the module in CEDARS
Select user type
Posted by Amyreardon ·
Status: Completed3 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments3

  • cedars team

    Team•

    Jul 15

    We have identified an inconsistency in the naming of bill reduction fields between the Filings and Claims modules.


    Currently:

    • Filings record-level download: Electric Bill Reduction / Gas Bill Reduction

    • Claims 2026 record-level download: Bill Reduction Electric / Bill Reduction Gas

    • Underlying output files (CEI/CET): BillReducElec / BillReducGas

    To improve consistency across CEDARS, would stakeholders prefer to:

    1. Keep the current field names as they are, or

    2. Standardise the user-facing field names across both modules?

    If standardisation is preferred, should we align on:

    • Electric Bill Reduction / Gas Bill Reduction, or

    • Bill Reduction Electric / Bill Reduction Gas?

    Are there any downstream reporting processes, documentation, or user expectations that we should consider before making a change?

    • cedars team

      Team•

      Jul 15

      Keep the current field names as they are

  • cedars team

    Team•

    Jan 28

    Add to the record-level downloads