Load Shapes – Improve Traceability and Visibility of Load Shape, TechID, and eTRM Synced Data

As a user reviewing Load Shape and Impact Profile data, I want clearer visibility into the relationship between TechIDs, measure packages, uploaded 8760 load shapes, and synced eTRM data so that I can more efficiently validate, troubleshoot, and trace generated outputs within CEDARS.

Background

Current Load Shape workflows require users to cross-reference TechIDs externally in eTRM in order to determine:

• Which measure a TechID belongs to

• Which uploaded 8760 data relates to a specific measure

• How generated Impact Profiles and outputs were derived

While the information is technically available, the current workflow introduces multiple manual lookup steps and creates friction during validation and troubleshooting.

Additional stakeholder feedback also requested greater transparency into:

• UEC data synced from eTRM into CEDARS

• Permutation data synced from eTRM into CEDARS

• Relationships between uploaded Load Shapes, TechIDs, Measure Packages, and generated outputs