Skip to main content

Claims validation: SEM Phase and Measure Impact Type

Feature Request20262026 Claim Spec Update QueueFixed Development

Add claims validation so PAs can catch SEM issues at submission time rather than during Quantum review, saving time and rework.

Review checks that the validation replaces:

  • SEM claims must populate SEMPhase

  • SEM claims must specify MeasImpactType = Cust-SEM or Cust-SEM-FuelSub

Requirements:

  • Applies to all claim types, not just placeholders

  • Applies to both zero-savings and nonzero-savings claims

  • Claims with SEMPhase populated and non-SEM MeasImpactType fail validation

  • Claims with SEM MeasImpactType and missing SEMPhase fail validation

  • Validation applies consistently across all claim types and savings values

  • Error messaging clearly explains what field needs to be corrected and why

Proposed draft rules:

Claim.SEM_Phase is populated if Measure.MeasImpactType = Cust-SEM or Cust-SEM-FuelSub 
Measure.MeasImpactType = Cust-SEM or Cust-SEM-FuelSub if Claim.SEM_Phase is populated
Select the module in CEDARS
Select user type
Posted by cedars team ·
Status: Completed2 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments2

  • cedars team

    Team•

    Jan 8

    Corina pointed out during the dev demo that sometimes SEM programs have neither field filled in. We may want to consider a universal way to identify SEM programs.

    • scefalletta

      •

      Jan 13

      Maybe this will help. For SEM projects the “MeasImpactType” is “Cust-SEM” or “Cust-SEM-FuelSub”.